A standard 22 250 Remington cartridge produces more than six times the kinetic energy of a 17 HMR, instantly shattering the assumption that these two varmint rounds compete on equal footing. While both share reputations as devastating pest eliminators, they achieve results through radically divergent mechanics. The rimfire 17 HMR zips a featherweight 17-grain projectile at 2,550 feet per second, yielding 245 foot-pounds of muzzle energy. In contrast, the centerfire 22 250 Remington unleashes a 55-grain bullet at blistering velocities exceeding 3,800 feet per second with 1,650 foot-pounds of punch. In our comparison, choosing between them isn’t about minor nuancesβit’s a fundamental decision between affordable short-range precision and raw long-distance power.
Quick Verdict: The 22 250 Remington wins for serious predator hunting and long-distance varminting thanks to massive kinetic energy and flat trajectories reaching beyond 400 yards. However, the 17 HMR is dramatically cheaper per shot, whisper-quiet by comparison, and virtually recoilless, making it the smarter everyday pick for garden pests and small rodents inside 175 yards.
Coyote and predator hunters needing reach and terminal knockdown power beyond 200 yards.
Target plinkers and pest controllers targeting prairie dogs or squirrels under 175 yards on a budget.
- The 22 250 produces over 6 times the muzzle energy of 17 HMR (1,650 ft-lbs vs 245 ft-lbs).
- The 17 HMR cuts shooting expenses drastically at roughly $0.34 per round versus $1.45 for 22 250.
- Expect 22 250 Remington muzzle velocities near 3,850 fps, beating the 17 HMR by over 1,300 fps.
- A 17 HMR barrel lasts well beyond 10,000 rounds, outliving a 22 250 barrel by nearly fivefold.
- Choose 22 250 for predators past 200 yards; choose 17 HMR for rodent pest control under 175 yards.
22 250 Remington vs 17 HMR: Head-to-Head Specs


On paper, the physical contrast between these cartridges looks like a David and Goliath matchup. The 22 250 Remington uses a massive centerfire bottleneck case burning roughly 35 to 38 grains of powder, sending 55-grain bullets screaming downrange at 3,680 feet per second. Meanwhile, the diminutive 17 HMR necked-down rimfire casing carries roughly 5.5 grains of propellant to fire a 17-grain bullet at 2,550 feet per second. These structural realities dictate everything from operating pressures to maximum effective distance.
β = better value in that row. Sourced from manufacturer specifications.
22 250 Remington vs 17 HMR: Performance & Category Ratings
Analyzing the category ratings reveals why neither cartridge completely dominates the field. The 22 250 Remington runs away with Ballistic Performance (9.6 vs 6.2) and Long-Range Trajectory (9.4 vs 6.8). It stays laser-flat beyond 400 yards, while the 17 HMR sheds speed rapidly and drifts aggressively in a ten-mile-per-hour crosswind once you push past 150 yards. Handloading Potential is an absolute blowout at 9.5 to 1.0 because rimfire cartridges cannot be reloaded, whereas the centerfire case lets you fine-tune custom powders and seating depths. Target Versatility also favors the 22 250 Remington (8.7 vs 7.1), which cleanly drops coyotes and feral hogs that would shrug off a rimfire hit.
Flip the script to ownership practicality, and the 17 HMR dominates. It crushes Value & Running Costs at 9.5 against 5.4 because rimfire factory ammunition costs roughly a third of centerfire rounds. In Shootability & Recoil, the 17 HMR earns a stellar 9.8 versus 7.4. It produces virtually zero muzzle jump, letting you watch bullet impact through the scope without blinking. Finally, Rifle & Barrel Longevity gives the 17 HMR a runaway 9.6 to 6.1 advantage. The 22 250 Remington burns out throat rifling in 1,500 to 2,500 rounds under heavy prairie dog fire, whereas a 17 HMR barrel easily lasts 15,000 rounds or more.
22 250 Rem
17 HMR
22 250 Vs 17 Hmr by the Numbers
Raw ballistic charts cut through marketing claims and reveal true field performance. Downrange drops, drift values, and retained energy demonstrate how bore diameter and case volume shape real-world shooting limits. While numbers on a ballistic calculator favor the blistering centerfire round in terminal authority, the rimfire’s ultra-low operational overhead tells its own compelling financial story. Examine the performance figures below to see how velocity decay, drop profiles, and per-shot expense diverge past the 100-yard mark.
22 250 Rem
17 HMR
Hover any bar for exact values. Each metric scaled independently.
22 250 Remington: Strengths and Weaknesses
Velocity defines the 22 250 Remington. Driving a 50-grain polymer-tipped bullet past 3,800 feet per second delivers devastating hydraulic shock. Coyotes drop in their tracks at 350 yards without taking a single step. The cartridge shoots remarkably flat, demanding minimal elevation holds across typical hunting distances. When paired with a steady π Harris S-BR2 Bipod β, it transforms into an uncompromising long-range exterminator. Handloaders can tailor high-ballistic-coefficient projectiles to milk surgical accuracy out of custom bolt rigs.
That extreme velocity exacts a heavy toll. Barrel life is poor. Sustained shooting sessions on high-volume prairie dog towns heat the barrel rapidly, eroding throat rifling after just a couple thousand rounds. Muzzle blast is severe and concussive, requiring serious hearing protection or dedicated suppression. Factory ammunition hits your wallet hard at over a dollar per trigger pull, making casual plinking impractical. The violent expansion can also destroy small pelts, leaving dinner-plate exit wounds on foxes or bobcats. If you require unstoppable knockdown power and flat flight paths across vast open acreage, investing in a rifle chambered for this round remains the premier move.

π Check Price on Amazon β
Price & availability subject to change. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
17 HMR: Strengths and Weaknesses
Pure shooting enjoyment defines the 17 HMR. Recoil is virtually absent. You never lose sight picture, watching your bullet strike through the optic every single time. That gentle behavior makes it an exceptional learning platform for novices and a relaxed tool for seasoned shooters clearing pastures of ground squirrels. A brick of 500 rounds costs what you would pay for two boxes of centerfire ammo. Barrels last almost indefinitely, easily handling tens of thousands of rounds without accuracy loss.
Its shortcomings stem directly from its tiny physical footprint. The 17-grain projectile carries just 72 foot-pounds of energy at 200 yards, making it completely unethical for coyotes at typical predator hunting ranges. Wind is your relentless enemy; even a gentle 7-mph breeze pushes this tiny pellet off target at 150 yards. Because the bore is so narrow, copper fouling accumulates swiftly, requiring frequent passes with a π Hoppes BoreSnake Rifle Cleaner β to maintain tight groups. You also cannot reload rimfire brass to squeeze out extra performance. If you want an economical, whisper-quiet varmint rifle for high-volume pest control across modest field distances, choosing this platform is an easy call.

π Check Price on Amazon β
Price & availability subject to change. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
- β Devastating kinetic energy suitable for coyotes, bobcats, and hogs
- β Laser-flat trajectory effective beyond 400 yards
- β Superior wind deflection resistance compared to lightweight rimfires
- β Fully reloadable centerfire brass allows custom tuned accuracy
- β Higher ammo cost makes high-volume pasture shooting expensive
- β Significantly shorter barrel life due to hyper-velocity throat erosion
- β Loud muzzle report requires robust hearing protection
- β Extremely affordable factory ammunition for high-volume sessions
- β Virtually zero recoil allows real-time impact spotting through the scope
- β Outstanding barrel lifespan exceeding 10,000 rounds
- β Minimal meat or pelt damage on small tree squirrels and rabbits
- β Quieter report makes it ideal for rural boundaries and farms
- β Severely affected by crosswinds past 100 yards
- β Lacks ethical knockdown energy for coyotes past point-blank distance
- β Non-reloadable rimfire cartridge cases
22 250 Remington or 17 HMR: Which Should You Choose?
Choosing between these two rounds comes down to your property boundaries, quarry size, and annual ammunition budget. If your shooting takes place on smaller rural acreage near populated structures, the 17 HMR is the sensible selection. Its modest report won’t panic the neighbors, and its lightweight, frangible projectile disintegrates on impact, dramatically reducing ricochet hazards. It excels at exterminating ground squirrels, rabbits, magpies, and garden rodents between 50 and 150 yards. When an afternoon involves firing three hundred rounds from the bench, your wallet will thank you for picking rimfire.
Reach for the 22 250 Remington when your target moves faster, weighs more, and stands much farther away. If you hunt hard-running winter coyotes across windswept plains or pick off rockchucks resting on distant canyon walls past 300 yards, the 17 HMR simply cannot compete. The 22 250 Remington ignores stiff crosswinds that blow rimfire bullets off course, delivering violent terminal expansion at distances where small calibers run out of steam. Pack your rifle in a rugged π Plano Pro-Max Rifle Case β and head west if big country predator hunting is your passion. Serious handloaders will also relish tailoring powder charges to achieve dime-sized groups at extreme distances.
Coyote and predator hunters needing reach and terminal knockdown power beyond 200 yards.
Target plinkers and pest controllers targeting prairie dogs or squirrels under 175 yards on a budget.
Final Verdict: 22 250 Remington vs 17 HMR
The 22 250 Remington claims the overall victory in this head-to-head matchup. Its overwhelming kinetic dominance, laser-flat trajectory past 400 yards, and dependable coyote-stopping power elevate it into a professional-grade predator hunting class that the rimfire cannot touch. It turns difficult long-range shots into clean, decisive hits regardless of challenging crosswinds.
Yet that raw capability comes with an unavoidable trade-off: cost and longevity. You sacrifice cheap ammunition, quiet shooting, and barrel life for breathtaking speed and reach. The 17 HMR remains an exceptional, cost-effective tool for clearing pasture pests inside 175 yards without disturbing the countryside. But when field conditions demand uncompromising terminal punch across open terrain, the 22 250 Remington stands unrivaled.
π Check Price on Amazon β
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
22 250 vs 17 Hmr: Frequently Asked Questions
Is 22 250 better than 17 Hmr?
The 22 250 is objectively superior for medium predators like coyotes out past 200 yards, packing over 1,600 ft-lbs of muzzle energy compared to the 17 HMR's 245 ft-lbs. However, the 17 HMR is much better for high-volume shooting and pest control inside 175 yards due to low cost.
Can 17 Hmr reliably take down coyotes?
The 17 HMR is marginal for coyotes. While fatal with precise head or vitals placement inside 75 yards, its tiny 17-grain bullet lacks the penetrating kinetic punch for ethical body shots. The 22 250 Remington is widely considered the gold standard dedicated coyote caliber instead.
Which rifle barrel lasts longer between 22 250 and 17 Hmr?
The 17 HMR lasts significantly longer. A 17 HMR barrel easily maintains peak match accuracy past 10,000 rounds. In contrast, the blazing 3,850+ fps powder burn of the 22 250 Remington wears down rifling throats within 1,800 to 2,500 rounds of rapid shooting.
Which is better for beginners?
The 17 HMR is far better for beginners. Its 0.4 ft-lbs of recoil is almost non-existent, avoiding the development of a flinch. At roughly $0.34 per shot, newcomers can afford thousands of practice rounds without burning through rifling or incurring heavy centerfire ammunition costs.
What is the biggest ballistics difference between 22 250 and 17 Hmr?
Wind drift and terminal energy represent the biggest differences. At 200 yards, a standard 10 mph crosswind pushes a 17 HMR roughly 8 inches off target with under 90 ft-lbs of residual energy, while a 22 250 drifts only 2.5 inches and carries over 1,000 ft-lbs.

Leave a Reply